I am sure there isn’t. I am sure there is no body and no DNA and nothing else of any physical sort. I am sure there are no photos of her dead body or articles of her clothing in Christian Brückner secret hiding place. Because when the police say there is not forensic evidence that she is dead but they have other evidence, not evidence that is good enough to go to court with, but which only “indicates” she is dead, this means they haven’t got shit.
And if they haven’t got a case, they have no business making known their theories to the parents and public with a vague “We are the investigators and therefore we are to be believed if we say this is what we think.”
As a profiler, I have cited all the evidence I have to support my conclusions. So far, all the German police have come up with is a creepy guy named Christian Brückner that was in Praia da Luz at the time and chatted on the phone that evening.
One of two things is going on: either the German police haven’t got anything on this guy outside of gossip and are just making up stuff to say they solved the case or they haven’t got anything on this guy and they are trying to pressure him into a confession with a plea deal.
Either way, this is shaping up to be the patsy many of us have suspected would finally be found to close the case.
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
June 15, 2020
1. Please check and amend your spelling, especially when it comes to the use of the words 'to' and 'too'. Look though all of your text for these mistakes!
ReplyDelete2. What we need is evidence that Christian Bruckner has any relationship with the McCanns or their friends.
3. We should be checking who booked the holiday and if THEY had any connections with criminals in the Praia da Luz area.
4. If Bruckner is guilty only in the removal of the body then he should be given the opportunity to tell the full story and provide evidence of any relationship to the McCanns and/or others - the incentive being a lighter sentence.
5. Any such information should be shared between the British & German authorities - in complete confidence.
Unknown, thanks for the spelling check. I write this things on the fly, so, quite frankly, I don’t give that much of a damn.
ReplyDeleteAs to Bruckner, It is unlikely he has anything to do with the McCanns. Whether the police are doing their job or not is something we will never know. But, since we know they are ignoring the evidence that supports the McCanns involvement, we can be pretty sure this is all nonsense or a patsy.
Nonsense = no charges?
ReplyDeletePatsy = a prosecution?
I find the later a mouthwatering prospect because then it would be a question of if a jury could ignore the evidence that supports the McCanns involvement. It would also mean Dr Perlin could get his hands on the DNA data.
That can only be a good thing in terms of establishing the truth which is why my money is on this all turning out to be nonsense.
Hell, the defence could call Gordon Brown and Cherie Blair to the witness box. They could point to the CEOP manuals found in the McCanns apartment and question why they were given restricted police intelligence. They could ask Kate why she washed Madeleine's soft toy when she learnt the dogs were on the way? Ask Gerry why he told the police both him and Kate entered a locked front door on May 4. And all that is before they get to question David Payne, Mathew Oldfield and Jane Tanner.
There is too much to lose with a prosecution in my opinion which leads me to believe this will have to turn out to be nonsense.
The Germans on the otherhand have nothing to lose with all this concrete evidence they have.
Interesting days lie ahead!
this, of course, is why it will never be allowed to go to trial. Isnt there anyone in the MSM who if not even ashamed - at least a litle bit annoyed at how readily their compliance in this is just assumed
DeleteThey want a criminal ‘snitch’ or (former) friends of this creep to come forward with concrete information.
ReplyDeleteA plea deal In Germany in a murder case ? I couldn’t find it.
Could this operation perhaps be a distraction ? Are they monitoring the McCanns, their spokesman, family and Tapás friends ?
And what about a possible link between George Burke Brooks, the pizzaman with the weird sighting in Lagos on Friday night close to 6.00am and this creep and Michael Terence Wright ? Between 5.00am and 6.00am Gerry and Kate stated that they were searching for their daughter in the dark. The couple didn’t sleep all night and made a lot of sms text messages, except in the mentioned hour. At 7.00am police came to their apartment and the both were standing outside and again sending sms messages and making phonecalls.
Brooks residence was in Burgau.
On Sunday Michael Wright went to his pizza hut in Praia da Luz. Was Madeleine’s body taken from the first hiding spot to Burgau ? The refrigerator scenario ?
George B.Brooks left Portugal before September 21 2007, after the McCanns became Arguidos. He is from Liverpool.
Pp
Meanwhile back at the ranch, the 'concrete' evidence you've all been searching for, some, indeed, searching the entire planet for has always been at Orchard House. Everything else is repetitiously propagandist illusion using crudely manufactured imagery and scripted, yet poorly enacted and insultingly written LIES.
ReplyDeleteMadeleine was not abducted.
Madeleine did not die in apt. 5A.
Madeleine did not die in Portugal.
Madeleine did not die at age 3, nearly 4.
Madeleine died at age TWO.
Madeleine died in England, and is buried in England.
You've been seduced into believing aspects of the official pre-written script, none of which are true.
And that's just the start of it, flatlining, [something the puppet Brunt is fully aware of] was no fun.
But the TARGET was hit, the real target, not the fake LEICESTER Brenda Leyland of the FAKE [Brenda Leyland] death hoax.
They KNOW what they've done and their mockingly arrogant response is precisely how they've made their beds.
Give it some time, and then watch this space....
Me
[My name is irrelevant, only the WHOLE truth matters now]
I can't see anything wrong with Pat's spelling or grammar. Anyway I don't think Christian Bruckner has anything to do with the McCanns or the disappearance of Madeleine. Being a paedophile and rapist he's just a convenient scapegoat. Last year Mark Saunokonoko spoke to Goncalo Amaral who said the British police would try to close the case by using a German paedophile in prison as a scapegoat. He has been proved right.
ReplyDeleteThey are pushing this patsy...to maybe get him to confess...its been done before...the true evidence in 5a has been swept under the carpet.....they are just looking at closing this.....and letting the McCanns enjoy their life uninterupted....they needed a suitable patsy and this guy fits the bill....we all know this case is dark and deep.....
ReplyDeleteThe police are going on very thin circumstantial information and i doubt very much that this man had anything to do with the disappearance of Madeline. We all know that this will come to nothing like all the other suspects before... why wont the police investigate the real culprits in this case Kate and Gerry McCann.
ReplyDeleteThe police are going on very thin circumstantial details and i doubt very much that this man had anything to do with the disappearance of Madeline. We all know that this will come to nothing like all the other suspects before... why wont the police investigate the real culprits in this case Kate and Gerry McCann.
ReplyDeleteIf he's set for life for doing the horrible job as it were I would think he will jut keep quiet and do the time. After all he'll only get 15 years.
ReplyDeleteIf he's tied to all the other unsolved cases they're throwing at him will he get a longer sentence.?
from what I understand he was sentenced for the rape of a 72 year old woman because his dna was all over the scene... yet none to tie him to the others.. I thought these people got better as they escalated not worse
And that's not to mention the very bast different types of victims boys and girls. 24 year old woman 62 year old drugs... patsy all over
Or in the remotely remote chance he was hired by the McCnns, to rattle their cage. Hope he doesn't "accidently" turn up in a prison body bag...
ReplyDelete(body bag: reference to the "closing" of the case of Olof Palme. It just happens that the prime suspect died 20 years ago)
ReplyDeleteMy thinking is different to yours.
ReplyDeleteI'm thinking they have witness evidence this guy has claimed he disposed of the body, therefore he knows she's dead and where her body is.
The Police now need him to tell them who arranged for him to collect the body and where he disposed of it.
Perhaps he's holding out to ensure he doesn't get too much jail time and whoever arranged him as the disposal man does.
I think it all hinges on the phone calls - who was he on the phone with for thirty minutes? I imagine it would take that long to a) persuade someone to dispose of a body, b) negotiate a price for doing so and c) arrange for the pick-up.
Happy to hear the flaws in this, as I'm sure there are plenty!
He hasn't claimed he disposed of the body. There is an unattributed news report claiming he once told a friend in a bar he 'knew what had happened to her.' Assuming that conversation even took place, it could just be supposition on his part. And the police haven't even interviewed him about her, so he can hardly have admitted anything. It's just a statement in the press designed to get the public to draw the exact conclusion you have - 'he knows what happened to her! That means he's admitting he disposed of the body!' When in fact, nothing of the sort is the case.
Delete
ReplyDelete@ Pat Brown
I wonder if you have profiled those responding to your posts & what you think of them?
Certainly they come up with some Brahmas when it comes to a theory. Mind spinning to even grasp why they have come up with most of it!
I am apt to agree with you that there is nothing the German's have on this guy Christian. He was certainly in Luz but how many thousands of others have drifted around the Southern Algarve and slept rough or in squalor just to be there or to run away from the law back home? A good many.
So Christian was around and he used his cell phone while in or near Luz and that is all this seems to hinge on. Pretty flimsy evidence I would say.
A creep he is but is he involved in Madeleine's disappearance? I would say probably not. If he is then maybe as a voyeur watching the McCanns - pretty dirty work indeed if he then conveyed their whereabouts to the person/s who actually entered 5a and took the poor child.
No proof of any of this but from reading your Daily Profile page when there is any action, it becomes incredibly clear there are many who have criminal minds posting. I'd be wary of them!
If there’s not enough evidence to go on there won’t be a case- closing “aha!” moment.
ReplyDeleteGerman police can’t close a case in the UK.
It’s either very silly attempt to get in on the act - which would be very disappointing for them as an organization- or they have it but won’t divulge it to team McCann nor the metropolitan police, because McCanns controlling the narrative has not worked out well for the other two police forces involved in the past.
The big media story seems to be that a letter was sent but not received yet. 😒
Meanwhile every Mickey Mouse “detective,” lawyer and spokesman has managed to get their mug on tv to give their opinion. Papers have trotted out their approved talking points “she was abducted! They were totally exonerated! Portuguese police bungled it by not sealing the borders 40 minutes after a child reported missing!”
If the former is true- german cops trying to get in on the act- it is indeed outrageous, however I did not see McCanns outraged at all the other “sightings” and “leads” ginned up by their hirelings, which had cops and the general public as well as friends and family upset and lives disturbed. The difference is that mccanns aren’t controlling this narrative and it deviates from their position that MM was “taken” but despite this somehow no harm has come to her.
Roll on the funding.
Funding for Met to “lol for her.” And no other missing child.
Funding for McCanns personally via their “fund” which is for them only - and no other family of a missing child.
They don’t want the case closed in this way - nor do the tabloids.
If the Germans had jack shit they’d be interrogating CB and charging him. They may get additional intel but given that CB was allegedly interfacing with PJ at the time MM went missing (at a drugs party bust) and hence was then ruled out, in 2007- this seems very odd.
British police “have been working on this” guy with the Germans, for a year.
Why this letter, why now?
Very Well stated Pat Brown..VERY WELL Stated!! THE BEST!!
ReplyDeletesince we know they are ignoring the evidence that supports the McCanns involvement, we can be pretty sure this is all nonsense or a patsy....you had this from the get go!!
Pat,
ReplyDeleteI don’t know how I got down this rabbit hole, that is the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, but here I am commenting on one of your blog posts. Until recently I hadn’t been following the Madeleine McCann case very closely but after watching the recent Netflix series I came away fully convinced that the parents were responsible and had played a part in the disappearance of their daughter. I subsequently came across other works that convinced me in my suspicions, including your media interviews. I’ve read most of the blog posts that you have written on the case going back to 2007. I really enjoy reading them due to their intellectual rigor and the critical thinking behind your arguments.
My thinking on this case has in the mean time changed after I read Diane Webster’s witness testimony. Now, based on the evidence of case, I’m convinced that Madeleine was abducted. Sadly, given the carelessness of her parents, an abduction would have been very easy to carry out. One the problem I’ve had with the parents being the culprits, which has been nagging for some time, is the narrow window of time of her disappearance. If there is any truth to the witness statements by the Tapas 9 group, there was no time for the parents to do a cover up. The question I’ve asked myself then was, who of the Tapas 9 would be the most reliable witness of the group? The conclusion I came to was that it would have been Diane Webster. Firstly, because she wasn’t really a member of the group, secondly, she was the one who the suggested that the kids might have been drugged, which I think they were and would have made an abduction very easy. Thirdly, her testimony is self-consistent with Matt Oldfield’s testimony. Their testimonies were taken on May 4th, in the morning. Both their second testimonies were consistent with their first one. There was nothing in their testimony to suggest that the behavior of Kate and Gerry was off during their dinner at the Tapas restaurant. There was nothing in the McCann’s behavior at the dinner table to suggest anything nefarious was going on. Kate’s reaction was normal up until the disappearance of Madeleine, which to me suggests a genuine surprise at the absence of her daughter in the flat. I don’t believe in cover up by the Tapas group. If the McCanns were responsible someone else in the Tapas group would be in the know but ‘lose lips sink ships’ so I just don’t find this very compelling. The Smith sighting was at 10 pm but according to witnesses, Gerry was with the group at that time. From the start, you have always pointed out that there is no evidence of an abduction. Correct me if I’m wrong, but what I take from your statement is that you are saying there is no evidence of a break-in at the 5a flat, which there isn’t. However, I think we can safely surmise that the patio door was unlocked and it would have been easy for anyone to enter the apartment and leave through the front door with a child.
1/2
Jacob
My conclusion is that on the night of Madeleine's disappearance the parents left their patio unlocked while they were at dinner and had given their children something to sedate them. How do I explain the strange behavior of Kate and Gerry after her disappearance? As far as I’m concerned Kate and Gerry McCann are nothing more than two self-serving lying narcissists. Because of their personalities they will never admit to any wrongdoing. I think Kate lied about the bedroom window being open when she went into Madeleine’s bedroom (see Diane Webster’s testimony). They used the break-in scenario to deflect from their abject neglect of their children. They have also shamelessly profited from their daughter’s disappearance. However terrible they may be, I don’t see any involvement on their part to directly implicate them in disappearance of Madeleine.
ReplyDeleteAs to the new suspect, Christian Brukner, he certainly fits the profile of someone who would abduct a child. As far as I understand, in Germany they would not have implicated someone unless they have ‘concrete’ evidence against them. It remains to be seen whether or not they are withholding evidence to public.
2/2
Regards,
Jacob
ReplyDeleteWell it has now come to our attention that the Portuguese authorities are not happy with Hans Wolters request for them to provide the saliva samples from the Gordon child for re-testing.
One could say they are positively tamping mad and affronted by the German's request. So perhaps no further evidence that way?
If they do take the German guy to court, they will have to explain how he got in and out of the McCann's appartment without leaving any traces, not even waking the children, how a corpse was left long enough for cadaver odour to develop behind the couch, in the bedroom closet, on Kate's clothes and in the trunk of the McCann's rental car three weeks later, how blood was detected by the blood sniffer dog in the same place as the cadaver odour behind the couch, how this blood was then found under the cleaned tiles in that location behind the couch, how the DNA of this blood corresponded with Maddie's in 15 of 19 markers. I would very much like to have this taken to court and for a jury to come to a verdict. So seeing as we can pretty much prove Maddie died in the appartment based on the evidence in the PJ files but we can't place the German guy (or any other intruder) in the appartment, the only possibility that this German guy was involved is if he played a role outside the appartment such as getting rid of the corpse, I don't see it as likely that the German police have anything.
ReplyDeleteNo forensic evidence (ie, body) but concrete evidence, say the Germans. Facts, not indications.
ReplyDeleteTwo things- what a brutal way to find out your three year old was murdered by a pedophile- in a letter that you learn of via the media - prosecutors found something in those memory sticks that proves something ...? The mind reels
Also, why was this guy ruled out in 2007? It was because he was at a party being busted by cops “at the time” the abduction occurred.
We only have gerry’s word for it that the abduction occurred after 9:15 - there’s a fair chance no one saw her after they put her to bed at 7 and went to the patio to have pre dinner vino. Matt oldfield didn’t see her At 8:30 if he even went in. Most parents of young kids especially light sleepers would not be so foolish as to bumble into the room they’re sleeping in once they’re asleep, in case you wake them up, and I don’t think gerry did either. I think he used the toilet and went to the kids’ room and set the door back ajar and left. Which, if tannerman was the abductor means the McCanns themselves opened that window as it wasn’t open when gerry and/or jane went by.. according to their own timeline and statements...
If no one properly checked the room and only listened at the door /window That would mean the abductor had from 7-10 although more likely 8-10pm. Could he have done it earlier, at 8:30 and by 9:30 or ten already be off getting drugs? Stashed in his van?
I’m other words did the Extra responsible “checking Scenario” result in the culprit being ruled out wrongly?
As a german i am shocked that this charade has finally come to us. That the media wasn't reporting on the true evidence in this case, is nothing new, but that the british government is now able to get our police and justice system to help covering up their mess, is unbelievable. Unfortunately many people in germany still don't know what the real evidence in this case is and all they have is maybe a bad gut feeling about the parents because they react to their odd behaviour or to the fact that they where argiudos once. This case and the covid 19 panic propaganda from our government, shows me clearly that our country and our media are not really democratic anymore!
ReplyDeleteHis “friend” is sure CB trafficked her to Morocco.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile no charges forthcoming and no proof.
Feels like a fund raiser- SY running out of cash
It amazes me that people make a comment on spelling or grammar but fail to attack the guy that suggests that Madeleine was never in Portugal!
ReplyDeleteI suggest that, before commenting, we all read Pat Brown's book/s, read the PJ files (and maybe Kate McCann's book)...
BEFORE MAKING ILL-INFORMED COMMENTS
@ anonymous June 18, 1:28p
ReplyDeleteThere might well have been plenty of evidence left but the PJ forensic officers failed to find it. There was a lot of dna about the apartment so trying to find one person's amongst so many others would be an impossible task in 2007.