Criminal Profiling Topic of the Day: Freedom of Speech, the McCanns, and Searching for Maddie
I have been getting a lot of questions about my search fund to be established with monies from the sale of my book, Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann.   Some of the stuff certain folks are saying is seriously ridiculous, so  I  thought it best I make a clear statement with simple points they can   understand.
1. I am not giving or receiving any monies from the McCanns' search fund.
2. At present, 50% of monies received from the sale of the Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann   will go to the Pat Brown Maddie Search Fund. The other 50% earned from   the book is income, not donations. I am selling a product and do not   have to donate all earnings (or any) to charitable causes (however, I do  pro bono work on other cases as there are OTHER missing and murdered  children and adults than Madeleine in this world, so part of my earnings  through any means funds this). I have chosen  to donate 50% of the  book's earnings to my Maddie search fund since she is the focus of this  book.
3.  The  Pat Brown Maddie Search Fund monies will be not be spent on a  personal  salary (any time spent will be pro bono). Monies will be used  for  expenses related to doing a search: travel, equipment, hiring of  local  PIs, or bringing in experts.
4.  If I can cover any search expenses  by another other method (media,  work in the same location, etc.), then I  will do so. I always endeavor  to always keep costs low when I do pro  bono work so that the funds will  stretch further: inexpensive hotels,  staying with local people, cheap  meals, etc.). If I choose to spend  above the cheapest rate I can  achieve, I pay out-of-pocket.
5.   The Pat Brown Maddie Search Fund will be transparent with all monies   earned on the book tracked, all monies put into the account tracked, and   all monies spent tracked. A full account will be made to the public of   everything associated with my fund and my searches.
6.  The Pat  Brown Maddie Search Fund has no connection with the McCanns'  search fund  and the McCanns have not given my fund any endorsement.  However, it  would seem to me if I search in previously untargeted  places and either  locate Madeleine or eliminate those possibilities,  then the search is  nothing but beneficial to the McCanns and is  following in the spirit of  "Leaving No Stone Unturned."
7.  There are four  theories as to  what happened to Madeleine which  influence how one searches for the  child; whether one thinks she is  dead or alive.
One:,  the  child died accidentally in the apartment in Praia da Luz and there  was a  cover-up; then we are looking for a dead child in Portugal,  Spain, or England.
Two: a local pedophile abducted Madeleine; then we are looking for a dead child in Praia da Luz, Portugal or nearby.
Three:  A woman wanted a little girl and got a man to kidnap  Madeleine. Then  we are looking for a live child somewhere in the world.
Four:  A pedophile sex ring kidnapped Madeleine and she is being  raped and  abused on a continuing basis. Then we are looking for a live  child  somewhere in the world.
Now,  as one only has limited funds  (even the McCanns, although they have  been quite hefty), it behooves one to put the strongest efforts into   the most likely scenario. If the McCanns were not involved in any way   (other than neglect) in the disappearance of their daughter, they ought   to be using kindhearted people's donations in the most proper way;   looking for a pedophile who abducted, raped and murdered their little   girl, get him arrested and convicted so that Madeleine gets justice, and   prevent another little girl from the same horrible fate. They should  be  putting a good portion of their search and investigative efforts  into  locating a local child sex predator.
Why?  Because the methodology  and descriptions of how Madeleine was  supposedly kidnapped and by whom  match a person from the area without  even a vehicle to take her away in.  There is zero evidence of any fancy  plot nor even a person smart enough  to park a vehicle in the car park  right outside the window of  Madeleine's bedroom in with which to make a  quick getaway. Instead, we  have the purported actions and descriptions  of some creepy,  not-so-bright fellow walking down the street with a  child in his arms in  full view of everyone. The chances of Madeleine  being taken by a  desperate wanna-be-Mom or a sex ring are minimal.
Should  the  McCanns still consider these rare possibilities and still look for  a  living Madeleine? Well, I can't blame the McCanns (if innocent) for   wanting to believe their daughter is alive, so I can understand and   accept that they want to put some efforts into that miracle possibility.   However, they should be honest enough and good enough stewards of   donated monies I(if innocent) to admit the likelihood of Madeleine being   dead is  very, very high and the likelihood of her being buried   somewhere in Praia da Luz or environs is also very, very high. Their   efforts should be concentrated there, with some monies set aside for the   miracle.
So,  I will be focusing on the two top theories; that  Madeleine died in an  accident and her body was hidden somewhere, or a  local pedophile took  her and her body is buried locally. IF it turns out  that I get ANY  information that proves Madeleine was abducted or if  any evidence turns  up that points to her murder by a stranger, this  information will go  straight to the police and the McCanns. If Maddie  was abducted and  murdered by a child predator, I want justice for Maddie  and I want that  creep put away and I want other children to be safe  from him.
My theory as I laid out in my Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann   is just that; a theory. If evidence surfaces that changes my view  of  what happened to Madeleine, I have no problem disclosing this and   adjusting my theory. Theories change based on available evidence; hence,   they are called theories, not facts. Theories often change over time,   even those postulated by law enforcement and the McCanns. Even Kate   admits in her book, Madeleine,  her theories of what happened that night have  undergone change as she  has spent more time analyzing the evidence or  after receiving new  information.
Why  the McCanns had Carter-Ruck threaten Amazon with legal action to get a  theory removed from public  view is curious as it is only a theory, an  opinion, one person's take  on probabilities based on what is known at  this point in time. Perhaps  we will find out why they went to these  lengths when the McCanns get on  the witness stand in a court of law  (when my lawsuit for libel and  tortious interference with business  makes it to court; I have retained  prominent attorney Anne Bremner of Stanford Frey Cooper).   Perhaps, then, they will explain why one person's opinion is so   concerning they need to go to extremes to get have it silenced.Madeleine   McCann is the most recognized missing child in the world, with the  most  media attention of any missing child in the world. Unless I am   mistaken, more money has been donated to finding Madeleine McCann than   any child in the world. My Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann   should hardly affect such a large and successful (moneywise) campaign;   so one wonders if the real issue the McCanns have with my profile is   that my theory might actually be correct.
I  believe  in Freedom of Speech. I don't object to the theories of others  on cases  even if they differ from mine. I don't even object to someone   analyzing my theory and writing their opinion of it. I would never try   to shut down their viewpoint (even when things are taken out of  context  and misrepresented in some way); I merely suggest that  interested people  go to the source and compare the two viewpoints and  think for  themselves about what theories and concepts are more  supportable by  evidence and logic.The  McCanns could simply have ignored this  profiler's opinion on  Madeleine's disappearance or made a statement that they do not think my   analysis is very good. If the book was truly libelous as they claimed   through their solicitors, Carter-Ruck, they should have informed me of   this or sued me directly. Instead, they went behind the scenes and had  the book  pulled from the market. Inquiring minds wonder why.
I  will be in  Portugal in February to support Detective Amaral's fight  against the  McCanns in court, to begin search analysis, and to hear  just what Gerry and Kate McCann have to say.
May the truth come out one day and justice for Madeleine McCann prevail.
The Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann is available online through Barnes & Noble and Smashwords.
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown

3 comments:
A lot of possibilities can be seen on this case. Both parties has definitely learned their strategies on the matter.
How funny. I just bought your ebook for my Nook BECAUSE it is banned at Amazon. I WILL read anything somebody tells me that I can't or shouldn't. LOL Kind of backfired on them, didn't it. Looking forward to reading your ebook. Thank you.
joan and the crew
Pat, have you given any thought to getting this out on Kobo and Apple iBooks? Both big audiences, mostly there because they don't want to buy into Big Amazon. Thanks for all your hard work.
JF
Post a Comment